Advertisement
Followed a link from the trade-press.
Looks interesting...
www.spiceworks.com/
Anyone here ever use it? Got an opinion?
Thanks!
- Steve
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Anyone use "Spiceworks"?
Tue, January 23, 2007 - 6:50 AMYep I use Spiceworks. It works really well for small-medium networks (500~ nodes). I probably wouldn't recommend it for anything much bigger than that. There is a decent review of it here: maximillianx.blogspot.com/2007/...e.html
It may not have everything I need but they're cranking out new releases fast enough that I think I'll get it (plus have a chance to tell them how to make it work) -
-
Re: Anyone use "Spiceworks"?
Fri, February 16, 2007 - 2:35 AM
> Yep I use Spiceworks. It works really well ...
So... Anyone else got an opinion?
Because... well, no offense, John, but I see you joined the day after I asked my question, replied *to* my question and haven't posted anything else since.
Zero friends, no real profile, this is your only Tribe, and... well... the truth is you look at least as much like a shill for the Spice folks as you look like a SysAdmin who's here to help & be helped... No offense intended. I just don't *know* you, and I *have* seen shills try to pass themselves off as "ordinary users".
I figure you may well be genuine in using Spiceworks and not a shill... but I've got no way to tell !
- Steve
-
-
Re: Anyone use "Spiceworks"?
Fri, February 16, 2007 - 10:00 AMSince you posted the original message I took a look at Spiceworks, it sounds really interesting. However I do wonder something myself, before installing it in the office, how do these "ads" work? Are the ads only on the server, or do they pop up on the users computers every time they log in or something? That would be my concern.
Have you actually ran it yet? -
-
Re: Anyone use "Spiceworks"?
Fri, February 16, 2007 - 12:12 PMI've been looking at installing it at one of my smaller clients. Once I get the ok to go ahead, I'll let folks know what I think.
-
-
-
-
Re: Anyone use "Spiceworks"?
Thu, March 1, 2007 - 8:58 PMI would be concerned about a number of things, namely
1) What does the longevity look like for the company running this show? To me it looks like it came out of left field and might go the way of the great auk as soon as the VC money runs out.
2) What are the qualifications of the "experts" that are going to be giving you advice? I think you answered that one, yourself in a later post, and you were right to be skeptical.
3) What's happening with the data being collected for all those nice Google ads? I'd hate to have to explain to a SOX auditor what is going on with my company's IP, as related to this piece of software. (Of course I'd rather pet a rabid pit bull on the nose than deal with a SOX auditor, but you get my drift.)
But hey, I've been wrong before.... I even admitted it that time. =)
-=Thomas -
-
Re: Anyone use "Spiceworks"?
Fri, March 2, 2007 - 11:58 AM
> 1) What does the longevity look like for the company running this show?
> To me it looks like it came out of left field and might go the way of the
> great auk as soon as the VC money runs out.
Always possible! FWIW, the domain was registered 9 years ago; could have been a speculator sitting on a "cool" name, of course, with the company that now uses it being just a year or two old.
The thing is free, and appears pretty darned easy to set up & use; not as if it's a grave risk to either your time or your money budget...
2) What are the qualifications of the "experts" that are going to be giving
> you advice? I think you answered that one, yourself in a later post, and
> you were right to be skeptical.
Eh. Even if the guy *WAS* a shill, he was probably a shill from marketing, and not relevant (either positive OR negative) to the tech-support issue.
Also, FWIW, I mostly expect to fix my OWN problems -- all I want from network monitoring is to spot things via automation, so I don't have to
waste my own time with ping/traceroute/etc, checking service-logs, probing ports, looking for disk-full status, yada yada yada....
> 3) What's happening with the data being collected for all those nice
> Google ads?
<heh>
More to the point... what data is going *into* the adsense/adwords/etc criteria? If it's just doing stuff like noticing a given LAN/WAN link that
consistently has 10% & up errors, and popping ads for LAN/WAN diagnostic tools, CCNA/CCNE/etc training, and so on... I'm down with that!
D'you have any reason to think that Google-based ad's are any threat to corporate IP? That they could/would open files (other than the
Google Desktop Search), read e-mail (other than Gmail), etc? Granted that Google *does* scan those products... but why would I (or you) care if Google gives targeted ad's based on aggregate IP traffic & IP errors?
That said, and despite my seeming to "dismiss" your cautions, I have to admit that everything you say is spot-on; it's definitely worth asking Spice about the long-term business-plan, profitability, etc; definitely worth talking to their techsupport/engineering; definitely worth asking about where it gets the data with which to target the ad's...
Here's a few links:
- thelazyadmin.com/index.php
- stupidapp.blogspot.com/2006/1...ng.html
- episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/f...903831
These are just casual mentions, but they seem "genuine" (specially the ArsTechnica one -- the user registered 6ish years ago, and runs a mixed Cacti/Spiceworks monitoring environment).
- Steve
-
-
Re: Anyone use "Spiceworks"?
Mon, March 12, 2007 - 4:06 AMNever used it.
Some alternatives --
glpi-project.org/spip.php
ocsinventory.sourceforge.net/
FOSS ticket system of your choice
and pchelpware.com/
Best wishes,
Denny